Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 11;71(3):581–591. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2033-5

Table 4.

Pharmacodynamic results

Part Cohort Patient number Cytogenetic alterationsa B cells (cells/mm3) Sum of bi-dimensional Lymph nodes (cm) Sum of uni-dimensional liver and spleen nodes (cm)
Day 1 (pre-dose) Day 2 % Variation Day 2 versus Day 1 Day 8 % Variation Day 8 versus Day 1 Day 1 pre-dose Day 8 % Variation versus Day 1 Day 1 pre-dose Day 8 % Variation versus Day 1
I Single dose

Cohort 1

50 mg/kg

1 Del 13q14 19,958 15,730 −21 % 22,839 14 % 2 1 −50 % ND ND
2 Del 13q14 84,053 NA 77,607 −8 % 7, 5 7, 5 0 % 2 ND −100 %
3 NA 19,069 15,845 −17 % 18,734 −2 % ND ND ND ND
4

Del 13q14

Del 11q22

25,274 21,856 −14 % 22,926 −9 % 3 3 0 % ND ND
5 t 12b 84,466 78,811 −7 % 67,663 −20 % ND ND ND ND
6 Del 13q14 Del 17pc 15,903 15,141 −5 % 8,244 −48 % 2 2 0 % ND ND

Cohort 2

83.5 mg/kg

7 Del 13q14 56,506 43,464 −23 % 62,890 11 % ND ND ND ND
8

Del 13q14

Del 17pd

11,682 14,862 27 % 17,326 48 % 3 6 100 % ND ND
9

Del 13q14

Del 11q22

23,608 22,973 −3 % 28,419 20 % 8 12 g 50 % 18 13 g −28 %

Cohort 3

139.5 mg/kg

10 No alterations 92,967 67,814 −27 % 83,055 −11 % 6 6 0 % 4 1 −75 %
11 Del 13q14 70,717 NA 82,019 16 % ND ND 5 5 0 %
12 Del 11q22 35,073 25,140 −28 % 33,130 −6 % ND 2 100 % ND ND

Cohort 4

210 mg/kg

13 No alterations 94,500 98,464 4 % 103,630 10 % 4, 5 5, 5 22 % 1 1 0 %
14 No alterationse 88,556 60,840 −31 % 87,782 −1 % ND ND 2 2 0 %
15 NA 14,330 13,483 −6 % 15,163 6 % 2, 5 2 −20 % ND ND

Cohort 5

315 mg/kg

16 No alterations 18,739 22,047 18 % 8,653 −54 % 16 11 −31 % ND ND
17

Del 13q14

Del 11q22

62,634 61,416 −2 % 68,075 9 % 10 9 −10 % 8 7 −13 %
19 No alterationsf NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Part Cohort Patient number Cytogenetic alterationsa Day 1 pre-dose Day 2, after the last dose %variation Day 2 after last dose versus Day 1 Day 8, after the last dose % Variation versus Day 8 after last dose versus Day 1 Day 1 pre-dose Day 8, after the last dose % Variation versus Day 1 Day 1 pre-dose Day 8, after the last dose % Variation versus Day 1
II Multiple doses

Cohort 1

2 doses at 210 mg/kg

20 Del 13q14 t 12 110,267 78,062 −29 % 94,694 −14 % 1, 4 2 43 % ND ND
22 No alterations 230,364 225,421 −2 % 296,661 29 % 15 16 g 7 % ND ND
23 t 12 Del 11q22 61,360 40,124 −35 % 83,364 36 % 31 31 0 % 2 2 0 %

Cohort 2

5 doses at 210 mg/kg

24 Del 13q14 7,240 13,448 86 % 6,440 −11 % ND ND ND ND
25

Del 13q14

Del 11q22

31,068 75,574 143 % 63,013 103 % 4 2 −50 % ND ND
26 t 12 9,177 5,569 −39 % 3,145 −66 % 1 4, 5 350 % 1 ND −100 %

NA no data available, ND not diseased

aCytogenetic alterations (del 13q14, del 11q22, del 17p and t 12) were assessed by FISH analysis. The thresholds for alterations, defined as the percentage of nuclei carrying the studied alteration, were >5 % for del 13q14, and >10 % for del 11q22, t 12 and del 17p

bDel 13q14, del 11q22 and del 17p not assessed

c26 %

d34 %

eDel 6q probe was used in this patient, and found positive

fDel 11q22, t 12 not assessed

gDay 22 data (day 8 data not available)