Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 22.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Sep 14;40(6):707–718. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9587-5

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regressions Predicting Youths’ Sexual Intentions from Mexican Orientation, Sex, and a Moderator.

	Moderators

	Maternal Acceptance (N = 244)		Paternal Acceptance (N = 244)		Time Spent with Parents (N = 232)
	β	SE β	β	SE β	β	SE β
Step 1
Adolescent Age	.31^*	.04	.30^*	.04	.29^*	.04
	F (1, 243) = 20.6, p < .01, R² = .07		F (1, 243) = 20.6, p < .01, R² =.07		F (1, 231) = 17.9, p < .01, R² = .07
Step 2
Mexican	−.06	.11	−.06	.11	−.08	.11
Moderator	−.23^*	.10	−.09	.08	−.11	.86
Sex¹	.50^*	.12	.52^*	.12	.49^*	.12
	F (4, 240) = 27.4, p < .01, R² = .35		F (4, 240) = 31.1, p < .01, R² = .33		F (4, 228) = 26.1, p < .01, R² = .30
Step 3
Mexican × Moderator	.08	.14	.14	.11	.07	1.14
Mexican × Sex	.21^*	.15	.25^*	.15	.23^*	.16
Moderator × Sex	.01	.15	−.09	.13	.03	1.11
	F (7, 237) = 21.1, p < .01, R² = .37		F (7, 237) = 20.7, p < .01, R² = .36		F (7, 225) = 16.5, p < .01, R² = .32
Step 4
Mexican × Moderator × Sex	−.17^*	.19	−.08	.15	−.05	1.54
	F (8, 236) = 19.3, p < .01, R² = 38		F (8, 236) = 18.2, p < .01, R² = .36		F (8, 224) = 14.5, p < .01, R² = .32

Note. The β weights are for each step in the analysis.

^*

p < .05.

¹

Boys = 1.