Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 22.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Sep 14;40(6):707–718. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9587-5

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regressions Predicting Youths’ Sexual Intentions from Familism Values, Sex, and a Moderator.

	Moderators

	Maternal Acceptance (N = 244)		Paternal Acceptance (N = 244)		Time Spent with Parents (N = 232)
	β	SE β	β	SE β	β	SE β
Step 1
Adolescent Age	.30^*	.04	.30^*	.04	.29^*	.04
	F (1, 243) = 20.6, p < .01, R² = .07		F (1, 243) = 20.6, p < .01, R² =.07		F (1, 231) = 17.9, p < .01, R² = .07
Step 2
Familism	−.02	.17	−.07	.18	−.17	.19
Moderator	−.22^*	.11	−.06	.09	−.09	.85
Sex¹	.49^*	.12	.51^*	.12	.49^*	.12
	F (4, 240) = 33.2, p < .01, R² = .34		F (4, 240) = 30.4, p < .01, R² = .32		F (4, 228) = 26.0, p < .01, R² = .30
Step 3
Familism × Moderator	.03	.23	.06	.17	.17	1.37
Familism × Sex	−.05	.22	.00	.22	.09	.23
Moderator × Sex	.07	.16	−.07	.13	.04	1.11
	F (7, 237) = 19.0, p < .01, R² = .34		F (7, 237) = 17.3, p < .01, R² = .32		F (7, 225) = 14.7, p < .01, R² = .29
Step 4
Familism × Moderator × Sex	−.05	.27	−.10	.20	−.18^*	1.69
	F (8, 236) = 16.6, p < .01, R² = 34		F (8, 236) = 15.2, p < .01, R² = .32		F (8, 224) = 13.5, p < .01, R² = .30

Note. The β weights are for each step in the analysis.

^*

p < .05.

¹

Boys = 1.