Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 1;8(9):1293–1301. doi: 10.4161/hv.20966

Table 4. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a multi-dose vaccine meeting minimally acceptable vaccine target criteria with no effect on megaviscera.

 
 
2-dose
3-dose
4-dose
Delay in cardiomyopathy
10 y
20 y
10 y
20 y
10 y
20 y
Compliance SAE Risk            
100%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1%
Vaccinea,b
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
 
3%
29c
Vaccine
476b
Vaccine
No Vaccine
Vaccine
75%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1%
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
Vaccine
 
3%
145
Vaccine
No
Vaccine
Vaccine
No Vaccine
689
50%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1%
Vaccine
Vaccine
40
Vaccine
212
Vaccine
 
3%
1,034
Vaccine
No Vaccine
675
No Vaccine
No Vaccine
25%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1%
278
Vaccine
790
65
No Vaccine
390
  3% No Vaccine 2,701 No Vaccine No Vaccine No Vaccine No Vaccine

a “Vaccine” and “No Vaccine” indicates that the strategy mentioned was economically dominant (was less costly and more effective) over the other for that scenario. bHighly cost-effective: ICER ≤ $9,867, Cost-effective: ICER $9,868–29,602. cBaseline minimally acceptable vaccine scenario