Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 5;28(3):353–362. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2217-z

Table 4.

Multivariate Regression‡ Results Predicting Adoption of Collocation or TIDES† or No Depression Care Improvement Model

Practice Implementation of Collocation Practice Implementation of TIDES Practice with No Implementation of Any Depression Care Improvement Model
n = 221 OR [95 % CI] n = 225 OR [95 % CI] N = 225 OR [95 % CI]
Clinician champion in clinic for depression treatment 2.36 [1.14, 4.88] *
Orientation towards quality improvement (QI) 2.30 [1.36, 3.87] ** 0.48 [0.27, 0.85] *
Sufficiency for information technology (IT) support 1.61 [0.97, 2.67]
Psychiatrist in primary care staff 1.04 [0.48, 2.26]
Psychologist in primary care staff 1.78 [0.96, 3.31] 0.37 [0.17, 0.80] *
Located in a VA regional network that endorsed TIDES 8.42 [3.69, 19.26] ** 0.22 [0.08, 0.57] **
Communication and cooperation 0.85 [0.47, 1.54]
Financial insufficiency 1.05 [0.70, 1.60]

* p < 0.05, bold numbers are significant. ** p < 0.01

TIDES=Translating Initiatives for Depression into Effective Solutions

‡ The multivariate regression models were constructed separately for collocation, TIDES, and no depression care model using measures that had bivariate associations of p < 0.10