Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pattern Recognit. 2013 Mar 1;46(3):692–702. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.005

Table 1.

Pixel by pixel segmentation comparison (R1=reader1, R2=reader2, SCES=single click ensemble segmentation, LS=level set, SGC=skeleton graph cut, p-value from student t-test for each comparison was calculated based on R1 vs. R2). The fraction indicates the portion of pixels in agreement.

Case SI value % (R1 VS R2) SI value % (R1 VS SCES) SI value % (R2 VS SCES) SI Value % (R1 VS LS) SI Value % (R2 VS LS) SI Value % (SCES VS LS) SI Value % (SCES VS SGC) SI Value % (SGC VS R1) SI Value % (SGC VS R2) SI Value % (SGC VS LS)
P1 93.14 77.95 77.67 65.5 62.73 54.19 80.41 70.08 69.75 52.16
P2 83.43 81.86 85.83 71.91 77.07 77.60 73.99 63.72 73.66 70.45
P3 64.23 82.13 72.37 60.19 64.36 65.64 62.59 55.27 63.62 62.71
P4 63.77 63.52 75.11 62.26 66.49 58.72 26.63 35.9 32.28 40.37
P5 77.57 67.00 73.40 65.61 63.48 62.22 45.77 51.75 52.17 44.84
P6 75.79 78.06 81.37 64.56 54.34 55.37 57.54 69.26 58.19 62.28
P7 94.90 97.13 93.61 81.48 79.18 82.36 79.36 77.94 78.01 77.66
P8 84.11 69.70 71.51 63.86 53.73 54.01 68.6 72.11 61.29 59.13
P9 78.65 80.49 72.57 55.53 54.18 48.11 39.06 44.59 43.06 40.58
P10 90.20 81.36 84.27 60.59 66.66 69.25 79.91 70.48 75.13 65.94
P11 78.23 76.34 71.23 54.71 55.55 59.97 66.47 53.77 53.93 55.52
P12 73.52 88.85 68.93 67.04 65.51 62.24 63.95 67.27 70.11 75.32
P13 76.30 84.48 88.04 78.96 80.84 84.10 80.22 73.58 77.79 76.58
P14 82.30 78.41 81.67 56.12 52.99 60.69 75.68 74.81 73.15 62.05
P15 76.80 67.02 68.25 75.18 69.89 62.04 56.19 71.88 63.9 71.63
Average 79.53 78.29 77.72 65.57 64.47 63.77 63.76 63.49 63.07 61.15
p-value - 0.7062 0.5592 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0028 0.0004 0.0004 <0.000001