Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2009 Mar 15;87(5):711–718. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318195c3d5

TABLE 3.

Outcomes by initial-adherence tertiles of 137 patients with adequate monitor data

Skipped dosses in months 1–6: (initial tertile)
Late outcomesa A <1.5% (n=45) B 1.5%–5% (n=45) C >5% (n=47) Overall P
Rejection
 Late acute rejection 8 9 15 0.224
 Late acute rejection rate 2.2 (±.7) a 2.5 (±.8) a 6.4 (±1.3) b 0.025
 Late acute rejection rate (≤5 yr) 1.9 (±1) a 3.9 (±1.4) a 10.8 (±2) b 0.001
 Late acute rejection rate (>5 yr) 2.4 (±1) 1.3 (±.7) 1.6 (±1) 0.436
Graft loss
 Late graft loss before death 9 9 14 0.438
 Late graft loss before death rate 2.2 (±0.7) 2.1 (±0.7) 3.7 (±1) 0.357
 Late graft loss before death rate (≤5 yr) 1.9 (±1) a 2.0 (±1) a 5.7 (±2) b 0.036
 Late graft loss before death rate (>5 yr) 2.4 (±1) 2.1 (±1) 1.6 (±1) 0.811
Any event
 No event before death 32 28 28 0.484
 No event including death 24 23 20 0.549

Between-group comparisons are within rows, with the overall P value given in the table. Significant differences between groups are indicated by lower case letters (a, b, or c): those with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05), whereas those sharing a letter are not significantly different.

a

Late events occurred 90 d or more after discharge from hospital at transplantation, and are reported and compared in two ways: number of affected patients; event rate (± standard error) per 100 patient-years during all followup before and after the 5th year post-transplant.