Table 3.
Stability index | Height β (P value) | Body mass β (P value) | BMI β (P value) | Adjusted r 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
General (N = 40) | ||||
| ||||
Overall balance | 0.292 (<0.001) | −0.365 (0.058) | 0.668 | |
Anteroposterior | — | 0.140 (<0.001) | — | 0.596 |
Mediolateral | — | 0.143 (<0.001) | — | 0.652 |
| ||||
Male (N = 25) | ||||
| ||||
Overall balance | 15.003 (0.046) | 0.175 (0.001) | — | 0.512 |
Anteroposterior | — | 0.143 (0.001) | — | 0.378 |
Mediolateral | 10.900 (0.042) | 0.128 (0.001) | — | 0.526 |
| ||||
Female (N = 15) | ||||
| ||||
Overall balance | — | 0.192 (<0.001) | — | 0.727 |
Anteroposterior | — | 0.136 (<0.001) | — | 0.663 |
Mediolateral | — | 0.136 (<0.001) | — | 0.767 |
r 2 = linear regression coefficient.
General group: body mass associated with BMI explained 66% of the stability index for overall balance, and body mass explained 59% of the anteroposterior stability index and 65% of the mediolateral stability index.
Male group: body mass associated with height explained 51% of the overall balance, body mass explained 37% of the anteroposterior stability index, and body mass associated with height explained 52% of the mediolateral stability index.
Female group: body mass explained 72% of the overall balance, 66% of the anteroposterior stability index, and 76% of the mediolateral stability index.