. 2013 Feb 25;8(2):e57079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057079

Table 1. Average cells AP induced Ca²⁺ parameters in control (CON) and following introduction of AIP (n = 6; 2 µmol/L), KN-93 (n = 6; 0.5 µmol/L) or KN-92(n = 5; 3 µmol/L), *p<0.05 vs. drug control.

	CON	AIP	% Change	CON	KN-93	% Change	CON	KN-92	% Change
Peak Systolic Ca²⁺ (nmol/L)	305±11	272±10^*	−11±1^*	295±9	264±14^*	−10±4^*	304±7	308±7	2±2
Minimum diastolic Ca²⁺ (nmol/L)	101±12	100±12	−1±3	111±9	106±9	−4±3	104±10	109±11	4±3
Ca²⁺ amplitude (systolic-diastolic) (nmol/L)	205±13	171±10^*	−16±3^*	184±7	158±11^*	−13±5^*	200±10	199±5	−1±3
T-P_c (ms)	80±4	85±5	7±3	80±6	88±8	10±3	76±9	80±10	5±4
T-50_c (ms)	176±15	205±17^*	16±3^*	172±7	199±7^*	16±4^*	188±13	200±1	12±8
T-90_c (ms)	302±9	338±11^*	12±2^*	305±11	323±13^*	8±4^*	273±19	270±18	−2±3
Beats per min	130±6	79±6^*	−39±6^*	141±2	96±7^*	−33±5^*	130±9	129±10	−1±2

Table 1. Average cells AP induced Ca2+ parameters in control (CON) and following introduction of AIP (n = 6; 2 µmol/L), KN-93 (n = 6; 0.5 µmol/L) or KN-92(n = 5; 3 µmol/L), *p<0.05 vs. drug control.