Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec 21;148(3):425–430. doi: 10.1177/0194599812471633

Table 2.

Information regarding testing and management processes documented in visits to the ED for dizziness and subsequently discharged.

Total All visits
N, %
N=3,522
Visits for
episodic
presentations
N, %
N= 1,484
Visits with BPPV
diagnosis
N, %
N= 156
Dix-Hallpike Test
    Documented 137 (3.9%) 89 (6.0%) 34 (21.8%)
  Results a
    Positive b 94 (2.7%) 67 (4.5%) 29 (18.6%)
    Negative 37 (1.1%) 22 (1.5%) 3 (1.9%)
    Unknown 6 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.3%)
Canalith Repositioning Maneuver
    Documented as done c,d 8 (0.2%) 4 (0.3%) 6 (3.9%)
    Additional mention e 9 (0.3%) 8 (0.5%) 9 (5.7%)
Consultations
    Neurology 16 (0.5%) 8 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%)
    Otolaryngology 2 (0.1%) 2 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Head CT 1,162 (33.0%) 488 (32.9%) 46 (29.5%)

CT = computerized tomography

a

Positive or negative results were based on nystagmus in 15.3% (21 of 137), symptoms only in 11.7% (16 of 137), and unknown (e.g., described as “positive” or “negative” or results not reported) in 73.0% (100/137). None of the visits with positive test results described the characteristic nystagmus pattern of BPPV (i.e., up-beat torsional nystagmus).

b

When the test was positive, the side affected was documented in 47.9% (45 of 94) of visits.

c

The side that the maneuver was performed on was only documented in one visit.

d

The patient’s response to the maneuver was reported in 6 visits and all responses were based on symptoms (3 with documented improvement and 3 with no improvement).

e

In these 9 additional visits, the maneuver was mentioned but not documented as performed. One of these indicated that instructions for the maneuver were provided, whereas the others suggested follow-up care for the maneuver.