Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Water Res. 2012 Oct 13;47(1):269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.009

Table 1.

Parameters and results associated with column experiments

no.a Column description Steady-state pH Fitted rate constants k (min−1) Removal efficiency b

Pd vicinity Effluent At electrodes Between anode and Cathode 2
C1 3 mM Na2SO4 + 0.5 mM CaSO4 2.5–3.0 7.5–8.0
C2c 3 mM Na2SO4 + 0.5 mM CaSO4 3.5–4.0 6.5–7.5
C3 3 mM Na2SO4 + 2 mM NaHCO3 3.5–4.5 7.5–8.5
C4 3 mM Na2SO4 + 5 mM NaHCO3 3.5–5.0 8.0–8.5
C5 5.3 mg/L TCE, no Pd/Al2O3 0.090 d
0.045 e
31%
C6 5.3 mg/L TCE, no Pd/Al2O3, 10 mg/L Fe(II) 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.007 36%
C7 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3 3.0–3.5 6.5–7.0 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.018 44%
C8 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3, 5 mg/L Fe(II) 2.5–4.0 6.5–7.5 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.042 59%
C9 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3, 10 mg/L Fe(II) 2.7–4.0 6.5–7.5 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.069 68%
C10 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3, 5 mg/L Fe(II), 1 mM sulfite 2.5–4.5 6.5–7.5 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.072 71%
C11 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3, 5 mg/L Fe(II), 31.3 μM sulfide 2.5–4.5 6.5–7.5 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.042 57%
C12 f 5.3 mg/L TCE, 2 g Pd/Al2O3, 5 mg/L Fe(II), 31.3 μM sulfide 2.5–4.5 6.5–7.5 0.090 d
0.045 e
0.020–0.041 g 46%
a

For C5–C11, 3 mM Na2SO4 and 0.5 mM CaSO4 were dissolved in groundwater as background electrolytes.

b

Removal efficiency refers to total fitted removal percentages of TCE in columns under steady state.

c

Two electrodes were used.

d

Reaction rate at Cathode 1.

e

Reaction rate at Cathode 2.

f

A much longer period of 10 d was lasted.

g

Time-dependent rate constants in the region between Anode and Cathode 2.