Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2013 Mar;16(2):269–286. doi: 10.1111/desc.12024

Table 2a.

Hierarchical Regressions Examining Contributions of Increasingly Complex Processing Speed Measures to the Executive Control Composite Scores in Experiment 1

Working Memory Inhibition Task Switching

Processing Speed Measure ΔR2 F for Δ df ΔR2 F for Δ df ΔR2 F for Δ df
Psychomotor Speed .005 0.3 1,56 .146** 9.6 1,56 .167** 11.3 1,56
Perceptual Speed .225** 16.0 1,55 .156** 12.3 1,55 .127** 9.9 1,55

Note—More complex processing speed measures predict additional executive control variance in young adults. n = 58;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01. Task Switching composite = average of global switch cost, color and shape switching task, global switch cost, quantity and identity switching task, and switch cost, addition and subtraction switching task z scores; Inhibition composite = average of stop signal reaction time, stop signal task, color minus non-color word completion time, Stroop task, and antisaccade percent errors, antisaccade task z scores; Working Memory composite = average of digit span backward, spatial span backward, reading span total items correct, counting span total item correct, and operation span total items correct z scores.