Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 7;3:18. doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-3-18

Table 1.

Results for the Drosophila melanogaster use case

Assigned family Reference family Number of candidates
dmel_1
mdg3
12
dmel_3
opus
18
dmel_4
copia
24
dmel_5
springer
6
dmel_6
Burdock
16
dmel_7
diver
8
dmel_8
HMS-Beagle
10
dmel_9
Tirant
19
dmel_10
Tabor
4
dmel_11
Quasimodo
14
dmel_12
Transpac
9
dmel_14
flea
16
dmel_17
invader2
8
dmel_17_2
invader3
7
dmel_18
Max-element
4
dmel_22
3S18
6
dmel_24
McClintock
4
dmel_26
Stalker
25
dmel_32
17.6
18
dmel_33
412
17
dmel_34
412
9
dmel_36
Idefix
5
dmel_39
rover
5
dmel_46
micropia
3
newfam_0
blood
25
newfam_29
HMS-Beagle2
4
newfam_40
297
20
manual
gypsy4
7
manual
mdg1
17
manual roo 94

This table lists the putative families as assigned during our semi-automatic evaluation run on the Drosophila melanogaster genome (left column). The center column shows the name of the known family represented by that putative family, obtained from matching of the candidate sequence against a reference sequence set. The rightmost column lists the number of candidates in the respective family. The dmel_26 group (matched to various Stalker sequences) was not counted as recovered due to the multitude of non-unique matches to multiple references. Families with the newfam prefix were obtained by re-running the classification algorithm on subsets of the unclassified candidate set. Finally, families marked as manual were derived non-automatically.