Table 5.
Predicted difference in booth coverage (%) between CMC and non-CMC areas of a block during supplemental immunization activities in Uttar Pradesh, India by number of social mobilization activities carried out and district*
| District |
Number of Social Mobilization Activities per SIA |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index (< 31 Mosque Announcements + < 33 Bullawa Tollies) | > 48 Mosque Announcements vs. Index | > 43 Bullawa Tollies vs. Index | > 48 Mosque Announcements + > 43 Bullawa Tollies vs. Index | ||
| 1 |
Baghpat |
17.0 |
21.8 |
21.1 |
25.9 |
| 2 |
Bareilly |
10.6 |
15.4 |
14.8 |
19.6 |
| 3 |
Mau |
21.0 |
25.9 |
25.2 |
30.0 |
| 4 |
Meerut |
8.5 |
13.3 |
12.6 |
17.5 |
| 5 |
Moradabad |
10.4 |
15.2 |
14.5 |
19.3 |
| 6 |
Muzafarnagar |
19.1 |
23.9 |
23.2 |
28.0 |
| 7 |
Rampur |
8.3 |
13.2 |
12.5 |
17.4 |
| 8 |
Saharanpur |
14.8 |
19.7 |
19.0 |
23.8 |
| 9 |
Shahjahanpur |
26.0 |
30.8 |
30.2 |
35.0 |
| 10 | Sitapur | 37.3 | 42.1 | 41.5 | 46.3 |
* Predictions are based on post-estimation linear combinations of estimates in model in Table 4 above. These predictions are adjusted for the District in which a Block is located, the average number of children less than five years of age across Blocks in a District, and the differences between Blocks and changes within Block values over time (time-varying covariate values at the Block level for number of social mobilization activities) by using a Generalized Linear Latent And Mixed Model (GLLAMM).