Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 17;12:603. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-603

Table 3.

Impact of nausea on quality of life during cycle 1 of chemotherapy: nausea dimension of the FLIE score in ITT population

  Placebo Cocculine All patients p
All patients
n=217
n=214
n=431
 
missing data**
15
13
28
 
number of patients evaluable
202
201
403
 
Quantitative
 
 
 
0.84*
Median nausea Score (Min-Max)
6.02 (1.11 – 7)
6.07 (1.22 – 7)
6.02 (1.11 – 7)
Mean ± sd
5.43 ± 1.57
5.45 ± 1.57
5.44 ± 1.57
Qualitative
 
 
 
 
Patients with no impact of nausea on daily life (i.e. a median score > 6), n (%)
103 (51.0)
102 (50.7)
205 (50.9)
0.96†
Stratum FAC-FEC
n=135
n=131
n=266
 
missing data **
9
7
16
 
number of patients evaluable
126
124
250
Quantitative
 
 
 
 
Median nausea score (min-max)
5.93 (1.11–7)
6.08 (1.65–7)
6.03 (1.11–7)
0.69*
Mean ± sd
5.37 (1.66)
5.48 (1.52)
5.42 (1.49)
 
Qualitative
 
 
 
 
Patients with no impact of nausea on daily life (i.e. mean score > 6), n (%)
63 (50.0)
63 (50.8)
126 (50.4)
0.90†
Stratum TAC
n=82
n=83
n=165
 
missing data**
6
6
12
 
number of patients evaluable
76
77
153
 
Quantitative
 
 
 
 
Median nausea score (min-max)
 
6.07 (1.90-7)
 
6.02 (1.22-7)
Mean ± sd
5.54 (1.43)
5.39 (1.66)
5.47 (1.55)
Qualitative
 
 
 
 
Patients with no impact of nausea on daily life (i.e. mean score > 6), n (%)
40 (52.6)
39 (50.6)
79 (51.6)
0.81†
Patients with susceptibility to NV (Yes)
n=61
n=66
n=127
 
missing data**
2
4
6
number of patients evaluable
59
62
121
Quantitative
 
 
 
Median nausea score (min-max)
5.85 (1.11–7)
5.81 (1.22–7)
5.83 (1.11–7)
0.36*
Mean ± sd
5.29 (1.66)
5.04 (1.71)
5.16 (1.69)
Qualitative
 
 
 
 
Patients with no impact of nausea on daily life (i.e. mean score > 6), n (%) 30 (49.2) 28 (42.4) 58 (45.7) 0.45†

*: Mann–Whitney U test †: Person’s chi-square test.

**: missing data i.e. number of patients with more than 5 missing items in the FLIE questionnaire.

n: number of patients.