Table 2.
Within-and between-group ROI-to-ROI analysis results with connections labeled as in Figure 1 (left image)
Healthy subjects | Bipolareuthymic | BP>HS | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Connection | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | IV |
Betasa | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.2 | 0.14 | 0.1 | 0.12 |
t-scores | 10.74 | 3.19 | 6.76 | 2.71 | 1.67 | 1.08 | 11.81 | 4.28 | 5.71 | 6.89 | 3.89 | 3.66 | 3.07 |
Z-scores | 7.24 | 2.98 | 5.44 | 2.58 | 1.63 | 1.07 | 7.61 | 3.84 | 4.82 | 5.52 | 3.55 | 3.37 | 2.88 |
FDR p-values | 0.0000 | 0.0096 | 0.0000 | 0.0207 | 0.1335 | 0.2947 | 0.0000 | 0.0006 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0012 | 0.0017 | 0.0237 |
ROI = region of interest; BP = bipolar disorder; HS = healthy subjects; FDR = false discovery rate.
Fisher-transformed correlation coefficients.
Align values by the decimal point.