Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;68(Suppl 1):111–119. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(Sup01)12

Table 1.

Studies reporting sperm retrieval efficacy and/or pregnancy outcomes in men with obstructive azoospermia.

Author Country Design No. of cycles Mean Paternal Age (years) Outcome Main findings Conclusion
Rosenlund et al. 1998 Sweden Retrospective NR 37 Recovery of viable sperm on repeated PESA High sperm recovery rates were found on repeated PESA up to 4 times PESA is simple, offers a high sperm recovery rate and can be safely repeated in OA men, yielding similar SRR results.
Levine et al. 1998 USA Retrospective 37 NR Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sperm retrieval and ICSI outcomes (CPR) using retrieved sperm Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sperm retrieval techniques (PESA, TESA) were demonstrated PESA and TESA are more effective alternatives compared with the more invasive MESA approach.
Dohle et al. 1998 The Netherlands Retrospective 39 38.1 ICSI outcomes (ongoing pregnancy rates) using percutaneously or surgically-retrieved sperm Both percutaneously and surgically retrieved spermatozoa provide adequate pregnancy outcomes. High fertilization rate was obtained after ICSI regardless of the retrieval method
Janzen et al. 2000 USA Retrospective 108 38.3 ICSI outcomes (CPR) using fresh or frozen epididymal sperm Both fresh and cryo-thawed epididymal sperm harvested by MESA yielded similar CPR Comparable pregnancy outcomes for fresh and frozen epididymal sperm, with logistic-related advantages for frozen sperm
Glina et al. 2003 Brazil Retrospective 79 45 Success at obtaining sperm by PESA and CPR after ICSI High SRR on repeated PESA up to 4 times PESA is simple, offers a high sperm retrieval rate and can be safely repeated in men with OA.
Westlander et al. 2001 Sweden Retrospective 22 34.8 ICSI outcomes up to ongoing pregnancy/delivery rates after TESA TESA can be repeated with no negative impact on the recovery of mature spermatozoa or pregnancy outcome Repeated TESA is safe and effective
Levine et al. 2003 USA Retrospective 112 37.1 ICSI outcomes (CPR) after percutaneous sperm retrieval PESA and TESA are highly effective for sperm retrieval and offer similar pregnancy outcomes with ICSI. Percutaneous sperm aspiration is effective, safe and reproducible
Dozortsev et al. 2006 Brazil Retrospective 185 NR ICSI outcomes (ongoing pregnancy rates) with percutaneous sperm retrieval Higher FR in the PESA group and higher implantation rate in the TESA group were reported; trends toward higher PR and lower miscarriage rate in the TESA group Embryo development was significantly better when testicular sperm was used for ICSI
Pasqualotto et al. 2006 Brazil Retrospective 155 NR ICSI outcomes according to etiology of OA Higher FR and implantation rate in men with congenital OA; similar PR in all etiology categories No impact of etiology of OA on CPR
Garg et al. 2008 USA Retrospective 38 39.1 ICSI outcomes (LBR) using TESA TESA is highly effective in recovering motile spermatozoa and offers adequate pregnancy outcomes. TESA is an effective means of recovering mature motile sperm which are suitable for cryopreservation in most cases.
Kamal et al. 2010 Egypt, The Netherlands, United Kingdom Retrospective 1,661 39.2 ICSI outcomes (CPR) according to sperm source and etiology of obstruction Similar pregnancy outcomes for different sperm sources (testicular or epididymal) and causes of obstruction (congenital or acquired) The source of sperm and the etiology of obstruction do not seem to influence pregnancy and miscarriage rates.
Kalsi et al. 2010 United Kingdom Retrospective 258 NR ICSI outcomes (live birth rate) using fresh or frozen-thawed retrieved sperm Higher pregnancy and live birth rates were reported for frozen-thawed compared with fresh sperm No negative impact of using frozen-thawed epididymal or testicular sperm for ICSI; a tendency for higher PR and live birth rate associated with frozen-thawed testicular sperm

SRR: sperm retrieval rate; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilization; PESA: percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration; TESA: testicular sperm aspiration; MESA: microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration; FR: fertilization rate; PR: pregnancy rate; CPR: clinical pregnancy rate; LBR: live birth rate; NR: not reported.