Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 27;8(2):e57777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057777

Table 1. Base-case estimates used within the model.

Parameter Base-case estimate* Reference
Male gender, % 75.9 Study database
Mean age ± SD 39.2 ± 9.5 Study database
Prior DM, % 3.8 Study database
Prior CHD, % 1.2 Study database
CHD risk, % [17]
No prior DM/CHD 0.17
Prior DM 0.82
Prior CHD 3.75
Prior DM/CHD 4.94
Effect of treatment on TC:HDL ratio [18]
LPV/r –0.17
ATV+r (1 & 2) –0.40
Risk of CHD being fatal, % 35.4 [19]
Effect of treatment on transition to HS with VL ≥50 copies/mL [12]
LPV/r Not Applicable
ATV+r 1 Not Applicable
ATV+r 2 –19%
AIDS risk (%) 0.09 to 94.35 (states 1 to 8) Study database
CKD risk (%) [13]
LPV/r 0.12 to 2.9 (cycle 1 to 40)
ATV+r (1 & 2) 0.12 to 23.3 (cycle 1 to 40)
OI risk (%) 1.76 Study database
Diarrhoea risk (%) Study database
LPV/r 1.76
ATV+r (1 & 2) 0.0
Hyperbilirubinemia risk (%) Study database
LPV/r 0.0
ATV+r (1 & 2) 1.47

SD: standard deviation; DM: diabetes mellitus; CHD: Coronary heart disease; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; VL: Viral load; HS: Health state; OI: Opportunistic infection; CKD: Chronic kidney disease

*

Estimates gathered from the literature and expressed as incidence rates (i.e., event/person-years) were converted into semestral probabilities using standard formulas

Transition probabilities of transitioning to a state with greater viral load (≥ 50 copies/mL) are 19% lesser than LPV/r

Effect on TC:HDL ratio is considered null in second-line treatment