Table 3.
Patient studies of retrograde amnesia examined in this paper.
Study | Reference | Test |
Subjects |
Parameters |
Fit |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topic | Task | C | K | A | H | R | Expl. | a1 | μ2 | λ | R2 | SSE | ||
a | Albert et al. (1979) | Famous faces | Cued recall | 15 | 11 | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.941 | 0.978 | 0.0017 | ||||
b | Albert et al. (1979) | Public events | Cued recall | 15 | 11 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.946 | 0.962 | 0.0025 | ||||
c | Albert et al. (1979) | Public events | Recognition (3AFC) | 15 | 11 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.778 | 0.967 | 0.0033 | ||||
d | Albert et al. (1981) | Famous faces | Cued recall | 12 | 8 | 13 | 0.000 | 0.028 | 0.988 | 0.971 | 0.0035 | |||
e | Albert et al. (1981) | Public events | Recognition (3AFC) | 12 | 8 | 13 | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.777 | 0.173 | 0.1440 | |||
f | Kopelman (1989) | |||||||||||||
Korsakoff | News events | Cued recall | 16 | 6 | 0.077 | 0.011 | 0.957 | 0.857 | 0.0641 | |||||
Alzheimer | 8 | Shared | 0.0024† | Shared | 0.902 | 0.0164 | ||||||||
g | Parkin et al. (1990) | Famous faces | Cued recall | 20 | 20 | 0.108 | 0.001 | 0.779 | 0.956 | 0.0055 | ||||
h | Parkin et al. (1990) | Famous faces | Cued recall with context | 20 | 20 | 0.078 | 0.004 | 0.779 | 0.609 | 0.0936 | ||||
i | Squire et al. (1989) | Public events | Cued recall | 9 | 7 | 0.128 | 0.006 | 0.831 | 0.999 | 0.0003 | ||||
j | Squire et al. (1989) | Public events | Recognition (4AFC) | 9 | 7 | 0.096 | 0.006 | 0.670 | 0.793 | 0.0204 | ||||
k | Beatty et al. (1988) | Mean of two testsa | Cued recall | 17 | 12 | 0.059 | 0.001 | 0.959 | 0.887 | 0.0020 | ||||
l | Beatty et al. (1988) | Mean of two testsa | Cued recall | 12 | 12 | 0.0122 | ||||||||
m | Beatty et al. (1988) | Mean of two testsa | Cued recall (extra cues) | 17 | 12 | 0.068 | 0.001 | 0.960 | 0.979 | 0.0003 | ||||
n | Beatty et al. (1988) | Mean of two testsa | Cued recall (extra cues) | 12 | 12 | 0.0536 | ||||||||
o | Kritchevsky and Squire (1989) | Public events | Cued recall | 6 | 6 | TGA* | 0.361 | 0.000 | 0.718 | 0.905 | 0.0140 | |||
p | Kritchevsky and Squire (1989) | Public events | Recognition (4AFC) | 6 | 6 | TGA* | 0.663 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 0.955 | 0.0280 | |||
q | Reed and Squire (1998) | Mean of eight testsb | 4 | 2 | P.Enc. | 0.034 | 0.003 | 0.889 | 0.683 | 0.0049 | ||||
r | Salmon et al. (1988) | Mean of two testsa | Cued recall | 14 | 1 | Hypoxia | 0.256 | 0.000 | 0.619 | 0.941 | 0.0277 | |||
s | Squire et al. (1989) | Public events | Cued recall | 8 | 4 | Focal | 0.191 | 0.005 | 0.689 | 0.911 | 0.0376 | |||
t | Squire et al. (1989) | Public events | Recognition (4AFC) | 8 | 4 | Focal | 0.137 | 0.041 | 0.521 | 0.808 | 0.0338 | |||
u | Squire et al. (1975) | TV series | Recognition (4AFC) | 16 | 16 | ECT* | 4.751 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.749 | 0.1122 |
C, Controls; K, Korsakoff; A, Alzheimer; H, Huntington; R, Remainder; Expl., explanation; P.Enc., Postencephalitis; *within-subjects design; †(1 − λ2)μ2 (additional neocortical lesion); 3AFC, 3 alternative forced choice; SSE, sum of squared errors. aFamous Faces and Public Events; bFour Recall and Four Recognition.