Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 28.

Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2011 Sep 17;23(3):1007–1016. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1774-z

Table 1.

Subject description stratified by sex and by visual SQ grading by the radiologists

	SQ 0	SQ 1	SQ≥2
All (n=200)
Number (n)	102 (51.0%)	57 (28.5%)	41 (20.5%)
Sex (men%)	51.0	50.9	51.2
Age (years)	65.6±8.9	64.2±7.8	68.6±10.0^**
Height (cm)	169.5±10.7	167.9±8.6	166.9±12.7
Weight (kg)	82.4±16.9	78.3±14.4	80.0±20.1
BMI (kg/m²)	28.8±5.3	27.7±4.6	28.4±5.2
L3 Integral vBMD (g/cm³)	0.168±0.040	0.158±0.031	0.142±0.039^,^*
Men (n=102)
Number (n)	52 (51.0%)	29 (28.4%)	21 (20.6%)
Age (years)	65.2±8.0	64.6±6.7	66.7±9.7
Height (cm)	177.0±7.7	174.4±6.0	177.0±8.7
Weight (kg)	89.6±15.7	87.0±10.4	91.7±17.7
BMI (kg/m²)	28.7±5.3	28.6±3.4	29.1±4.1
L3 Integral vBMD (g/cm³)	0.174±0.039	0.162±0.026	0.163±0.038
Women (n=98)
Number (n)	50 (51.0%)	28 (28.6%)	20 (20.4%)
Age (years)	66.0±9.8	63.8±9.0	70.6±10.2^**
Height (cm)	161.3±6.7	161.3±5.2	156.2±5.4^,^*
Weight (kg)	74.8±14.6	69.3±12.3	68.2±14.9
BMI (kg/m²)	28.8±5.3	26.7±5.4	27.6±6.0
L3 Integral vBMD (g/cm³)	0.162±0.041	0.154±0.036	0.118±0.024^,^*

^*

p<0.05 comparing SQ 0 vs. SQ≥2,

^**

p<0.05 comparing SQ 1 vs. SQ≥2 by pairwise tests