Table 1. Experimentally Characterized IDPs from the LEA Family.
PFAMa | Groupb | Classc | Protein | Species | Secondary Structures and Transitions | Methodsd | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PF00477 | 1 | 5 | Em | Wheat (Triticum aestivum) | 17% β-Sheet, 13% α-helix; 29% α-helix with TFE | CD | McCubbin et al. (1985) |
p11 | Pea (Pisum sativum) | Largely unstructured in solution; conformation resistant to heat | CD | Russouw et al. (1997) | |||
rGmD-19 | Soybean (Glycine max) | Highly disordered, 6 to 14% poly (l-Pro)-type structure (PII); 30% α-helix with TFE | DSC, CD | Soulages et al. (2002) | |||
Mt-Em6 | M. truncatula | 37% α-helix, 10% β-sheet; increase to 60% α-helix upon drying | FTIR | Boudet et al. (2006) | |||
PF00257 | 2 | 1 | Dsp16 | Craterostigma plantagineum | Largely unstructured with some local residual structural elements; TFE promotes its folding | NMR | Lisse et al. (1996) |
4 | Cowpea dehydrin | Vigna unguiculata | Largely unstructured; folded into α-helix with SDS | CD | Ismail et al. (1999) | ||
3 | Cu-COR19 | C. unshiu | Largely unstructured; α-helix induced by SDS | CD | Hara et al. (2001) | ||
2(DHNs) | Cor47 | Arabidopsis thaliana | 5% α-Helix, 15% PII; 50% α-helix with TFE | CD | Mouillon et al. (2006) | ||
4 | Lti30 | 0.3% α-Helix, 14% PII; 30% α-helix with TFE | |||||
2 | Lti29 | 0.8% α-Helix, 12% PII; 30% α-helix with TFE | |||||
1 | Rab18 | 12% PII; no α-helix induced with TFE | |||||
2 1 | ERD10 ERD14 | Largely unstructured; α-helix induced by TFE, no structural changes binding to lipid vesicles | NMR and CD | Kovacs et al. (2008) | |||
1 | K2 | Vitis riparia | Highly disordered in the middle Φ-region, transient α-helices in K-regions at both ends | NMR | Hughes and Graether (2011) | ||
1 | DHN1 | Maize | Largely unstructured; 9.5% α-helix induced by lipid vesicles or SDS | CD | Koag et al. (2003) | ||
4 | Gm-DHN1 | Soybean | 27% PII at 12°C, 15% PII at 80°C; TFE and SDS induce only moderate α-helix | DSC and CD | Soulages et al. (2003) | ||
2 | Ts-DHN-1 Ts-DHN-2 | T. salsuginea | Both largely unstructured; 31% β-sheet, 18% α-helix for TsDHN-1, and 24% β-sheet, 28% α-helix for TsDHN-2 with lipid vesicles | FTIR and CD | Rahman et al. (2010) | ||
PF02987 | 3 | 6 | D-7 | Typha latifolia | Largely unstructured; 24% β-sheet, 51% α-helix upon fast drying, 45% β-sheet, 40% α-helix upon slow drying | FTIR | Wolkers et al. (2001) |
6 | COR15A COR15B | Arabidopsis | Both highly disordered; 65% α-helix (COR15A) and 57% α-helix (COR15B) in the dry state | CD | Thalhammet al. (2010) | ||
6 | LEA7 | Arabidopsis | Largely unstructured in solution; 15% β-sheet, 27% α-helix in dry state, α-helix is promoted with lipid vesicles | FTIR and CD | Popova et al. (2011) | ||
6 | LEAM | Pea | Largely unstructured in solution; 50% α-helix with SDS, 70% α-helix with TFE or in dry state | FTIR and CD | Tolleter et al. (2007) | ||
PF03760 | 4 | 10 | Gm-PM16 | Soybean | 25% α-helix; 90% α-helix with SDS, TFE or upon drying | FTIR and CD | Shih et al. (2004) |
10 | LEA18 | Arabidopsis | Largely unstructured; 35% β-sheet, 20% α-helix with negatively charged lipid vesicles | CD | Hundertmark et al. (2011) | ||
PF04927 | 5 | 11 | Mt-PM25 | M. truncatula | Mostly unstructured in solution; increase to 56% α-helix and 25% β-sheet upon drying | FTIR and CD | Boudet et al. (2006); Boucher et al. (2010) |
PF03242 | 5 | 9 | Lj-IDP1 | Lotus japonicas | Largely unstructured in solution; 40% α-helix, 15% β-sheet induced by TFE or upon drying | CD, NMR, and FTIR | Haaning et al. (2008) |
This is a major but not exhaustive list for the experimentally characterized IDPs of LEA family.
Protein family (Pfam) ID.
Former LEA protein groups.
New classification according to Jaspard et al. (2012).
Circular dichroism (CD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).