Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Wildl Dis. 2012 Apr;48(2):382–393. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.2.382

Table 2.

Detection of type-A influenza virus subtypes by fecal and cloacal swab sampling of shorebirds during am overlapping one week period at Delaware Bay, USA, 2000–2009

Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Week of sampling May 15-21 May 15-21 May 15-21 May 15-21 May 15-21 May 15-21 May 22-28 May 22-28 May 15-21 May 15-21
Total no. subtypes (no. viruses) 11 (n=60) 9 (n=77) 11 (n=88) 12 (n=47) 5 (n=34) 4 (n=49) 12 (n=73) 15 (n=48) 15 (n=84) 13 (n=68)
UGAa total subtypes detected (no. viruses) % subtypes detected 7 (n=23) 64% 3 (n=8) 33% 7 (n=17) 64% 9 (n=28) 75% 3 (n=20) 60% 3 (n=13) 75% 5 (n=30) 42% 2 (n=9) 13% 8 (n=40) 53% 3 (n=11) 23%
SJCRHb % of total subtypes detected (no. viruses) % subtypes detected 8 (n=37) 73% 9 (n=69) 100% 10 (n=71) 91% 5 (n=19) 42%] 5 (n=14) 100% 4 (n=36) 100% 10 (n=43) 83% 15 (n=39) 100% 11 (n=44) 73% 12 (n=57) 92%
No. subtypes/isolate UGA 0.30 0.38 0.41 0.32 0.15 0.23 0.17 0.22 0.20 0.27
No. subtypes/isolate SJCRH 0.21 0.13 0.14 0.26 0.36 0.11 0.23 0.38 0.25 0.21
a

Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia

b

St Jude Children’s Research Hospital