Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 4;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-17

Table 1.

Comparison of results obtained by different methods for nonamplified and amplified cases (n = 64)

Manual scoring Tile-sampling analysis
Nuclei-sampling analysis
Automated analysis
After human correction
Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified
Nonamplified
32
0
0
32
0
0
32
0
0
Amplified 0 0 32 0 1 31 0 0 32