Skip to main content
. 2012 Summer;18(3):220–231. doi: 10.1310/sci1803-220

Table 3.

Results of hierarchical regression analysis predicting “informal frequency participation” (n = 200)

Variable B SE B β
Step 1
  Sexa .090 .031 .188**
  Level of injuryb .084 .035 .158*
  Caregiver education .016 .009 .111
  Age at interview -.021 .005 -.293**
Step 2a
  Sex .076 .031 .159*
  Level of injuryb .074 .034 .140*
  Caregiver ed .012 .009 .087
  Age at interview -.017 .005 -.242***
  Self-criticis -.068 .034 -.135*
  Social support .105 .035 .198**

Note: R2 =.187 for step 1; ∆R2= .209** for step 2.

a

Male=0; Female=1.

b

Tetraplegia=0; Paraplegia=1.

*

P < .05.

**

P < .01.

***

P < .001.