Table 4.
Statistical significance test for local quality prediction
| Method | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProQ2 |
1 |
|
-127.47 |
-142.98 |
-170.37 |
-152.64 |
| MetaMQAP |
2 |
n/a |
|
-95.06 |
-152.15 |
-170.69 |
| QMEAN |
3 |
-146.99 |
n/a |
|
-140.19 |
-176.87 |
| ProQ |
4 |
-164.75 |
n/a |
-121.07 |
|
-191.26 |
| QMEANclust | 5 | -168.81 | n/a | -188.12 | -195.66 |
Pairwise statistical significance test on the correlation coefficients for local quality prediction from CASP8 (below diagonal) and CASP9 (above diagonal). The values correspond to the logarithm of the P-value for methods being statistically indistinguishable, obtained by comparing the distribution of Fisher’s Z (Eq: 1) for the correlation coefficients, R, from Table 3.