Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;8(2):e57568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057568

Table 3. Summary results for AMOVA analyses of the 14 populations of M. alternatus from China that were compared using three grouping criteria (see details in Table 1).

Grouping criteria Source of variation d.f. Variance components % of variation F P
Port distribution Among groups 1 0.31784Va 5.64 F CT = 0.056 0.145
Among populations within groups 12 2.56276Vb 45.44 F SC = 0.482 0.000
Within populations 126 2.75883Vc 48.92 F ST = 0.511 0.000
Total 139 5.63943
Regional economic status Among groups 2 1.16196Va 19.87 F CT = 0.199 0.003
Among populations within groups 11 1.92598Vb 32.94 F SC = 0.411 0.000
Within populations 126 2.75883Vc 47.19 F ST = 0.528 0.000
Total 139 5.84677
Regional freight turnover Among groups 2 1.17718 Va 20.12 F CT = 0.201 0.005
Among populations within groups 11 1.91544 Vb 32.73 F SC = 0.410 0.000
Within populations 126 2.75883 Vc 47.15 F ST = 0.529 0.000
Total 139 5.85146
Pinewood nematode infestationstatus Among groups 1 0.12418Va 2.24 F CT = 0.022 0.255
Among populations within groups 12 2.66900Vb 48.07 F SC = 0.492 0.000
Within populations 126 2.75883Vc 49.69 F ST = 0.503 0.000
Total 139 5.55202