Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;8(2):e57088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057088

Table 2. Summary of the models presented in this analysis.Inline graphic

Model Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Host Regen. Abs/CTL/IFN Other cells
Bocharov [2] 13 49 19 Human yes Abs/CTL/IFN Antigen-presenting macrophages, T and B helper cells, B cells, plasma cells, IFN-producing macrophages.
Baccam [4] 6 9 36 Human no IFN
Hancioglu [31] 10 28 0Inline graphic Human yes Abs/CTL/IFN Antigen-presenting macrophages, plasma cells.
Lee [22] 15 48 42 Mouse yes Abs/CTL Dendritic cells, naive and effector CD4Inline graphic T cells, naive CD8Inline graphic T cells, naive and activated B cells, Long- and short-lived plasma cells.
Handel [6] 6 8 50 Mouse yes Abs/IFN
Miao [23] Inline graphic 6 8 64 Mouse yes Abs/CTL
Saenz [32] Inline graphic 8 12 96 Horse no IFN
Pawelek [37] Inline graphic 5 11 90 Horse no IFN

Inline graphic Inline graphic (number of variables), Inline graphic (number of parameters), Inline graphic (number of data points), Regen. (whether the model includes cell regeneration).

Inline graphic Model was not mathematically fit to data, but did have to conform to some general criteria.

Inline graphic We consider two different parameter sets for this model (Miao split and Miao full). The differences between these two models are described in Methods.

Inline graphic The Saenz and Pawelek models were fit to the same data.