Table 1.

Sample of relevant studies on emotion's effect on contextual and relational information, organized by outcome and study design.

Enhanced	Impaired
Source memory • Word-color, word-color frame (Doerksen and Shimamura, 2001) • Word-location (MacKay and Ahmetzanov, 2005) • Word-color, word-location (D'Argembeau and Van der Linden, 2004) • Picture-location ◦ (Mather and Nesmith, 2008) ◦ (Nashiro and Mather, 2011) • Scenes-location, within list order (Schmidt et al., 2011) • Temporal context: predictive preceding neutral item (Knight and Mather, 2009) • Word-task (seen vs. imagined) (Kensinger and Schacter, 2006b) Paired Design • Taboo word-neutral word in sentence, or taboo word-word pairs (Guillet and Arndt, 2009) No effect of emotion Source Memory • Scene-task association (color vs. visual complexity judgment) (Sharot and Yonelinas, 2008) • Paired scene-location (Mather et al., 2009) Paired design • Central neutral word-peripheral emotional/neutral word (Sharot and Phelps, 2004)	Source memory • Word, picture-task (animacy vs. commonness) (Kensinger and Schacter, 2006a) • Word-task (seen vs. heard) (Cook et al., 2007) • Scene-color frame (Rimmele et al., 2011) • Scene-locations (set of 4 scenes in 1/8 locations (Mather et al., 2006) • Face-location (Mather and Knight, 2008) Scene context • Emotional item embedded in scene, impaired detailed memory for scene ◦ (Kensinger et al., 2007) ◦ (Christianson et al., 1991) • Neutral peripheral object embedded in emotional scene; binding of scene-object ◦ (Touryan et al., 2007) ◦ (Rimmele et al., 2011) • Temporal context: non-predictive preceding neutral item (Knight and Mather, 2009) Paired designs • Word-word pairs (Pierce and Kensinger, 2011) • Sound-digit, face-hat pairs (Mather and Knight, 2008) • Picture-shape pairs (Nashiro and Mather, 2011)

Enhanced

Impaired

Source memory
- • Word-color, word-color frame (Doerksen and Shimamura, 2001)
- • Word-location (MacKay and Ahmetzanov, 2005)
- • Word-color, word-location (D'Argembeau and Van der Linden, 2004)
- • Picture-location
  - ◦ (Mather and Nesmith, 2008)
  - ◦ (Nashiro and Mather, 2011)
- • Scenes-location, within list order (Schmidt et al., 2011)
- • Temporal context: predictive preceding neutral item (Knight and Mather, 2009)
  - • Word-task (seen vs. imagined) (Kensinger and Schacter, 2006b)
Paired Design
- • Taboo word-neutral word in sentence, or taboo word-word pairs (Guillet and Arndt, 2009)
No effect of emotion
Source Memory
- • Scene-task association (color vs. visual complexity judgment) (Sharot and Yonelinas, 2008)
- • Paired scene-location (Mather et al., 2009)
Paired design
- • Central neutral word-peripheral emotional/neutral word (Sharot and Phelps, 2004)

Source memory
- • Word, picture-task (animacy vs. commonness) (Kensinger and Schacter, 2006a)
- • Word-task (seen vs. heard) (Cook et al., 2007)
- • Scene-color frame (Rimmele et al., 2011)
- • Scene-locations (set of 4 scenes in 1/8 locations (Mather et al., 2006)
- • Face-location (Mather and Knight, 2008)
Scene context
- • Emotional item embedded in scene, impaired detailed memory for scene
  - ◦ (Kensinger et al., 2007)
  - ◦ (Christianson et al., 1991)
- • Neutral peripheral object embedded in emotional scene; binding of scene-object
  - ◦ (Touryan et al., 2007)
  - ◦ (Rimmele et al., 2011)
- • Temporal context: non-predictive preceding neutral item (Knight and Mather, 2009)
Paired designs
- • Word-word pairs (Pierce and Kensinger, 2011)
- • Sound-digit, face-hat pairs (Mather and Knight, 2008)
- • Picture-shape pairs (Nashiro and Mather, 2011)