Table 3.
Mulitvariate logistic regression of the effect of condom negotiation on condom use at the last sexual intercourse among 15-49 year-old women in rural Tanzania, 2011 (n = 2,557)
| |
Condom use at the last sexual intercourse |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Odds Ratio (OR) | Standard Error (SE) | 95% Confidence interval (CI) | P - value |
|
Negotiation of condom use |
|
|
|
|
| Not confident |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Confident |
3.13 |
0.55 |
2.22-4.41 |
<0.001 |
|
Marital status |
|
|
|
|
| Currently married or living with a partner as married |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Divorced/Widowed |
3.64 |
0.65 |
2.56-5.17 |
<0.001 |
| Single |
4.09 |
0.58 |
3.10-5.40 |
<0.001 |
|
Age group (in years) |
|
|
|
|
| <20 |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| 20-29 |
0.56 |
0.09 |
0.41-0.76 |
<0.001 |
| 30-39 |
0.49 |
0.08 |
0.34-0.68 |
<0.001 |
| 40-49 |
0.38 |
0.08 |
0.25-0.58 |
<0.001 |
|
Educational attainment |
|
|
|
|
| Never been to school |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Primary |
0.96 |
0.15 |
0.70-1.31 |
0.780 |
| Secondary and higher |
2.04 |
0.45 |
1.31-3.15 |
0.001 |
|
Religion |
|
|
|
|
| Christian |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Muslim |
1.07 |
0.12 |
0.86-1.33 |
0.561 |
| Other (e.g. traditional etc.) |
1.17 |
0.48 |
0.52-2.62 |
0.707 |
|
Household wealth status |
|
|
|
|
| Rich |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Middle |
1.16 |
0.16 |
0.89-1.51 |
0.271 |
| Poor |
0.89 |
0.13 |
0.67-1.17 |
0.394 |
|
Can people reduce their chances of contracting HIV by using a condom every time they have sex? |
||||
| Yes |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| No |
0.73 |
0.11 |
0.54-1.00 |
0.047 |
| Don’t know |
0.61 |
0.18 |
0.34-1.11 |
0.090 |
|
Number of sexual partners a woman has had in the past 12 months |
||||
| At most one |
1.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| At least two (multiple partner) | 3.32 | 0.58 | 2.36-4.68 | <0.001 |
Goodness-of-fit test P = 0.259.