Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 25;22(3):633–641. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2487-5

Table 2.

Perioperative and follow-up data

No. of patient Location of infection Level of fixation Segm. fused Cage Duration of surgery (min) Blood loss (ml) Ambulatory status (ability to walk unaided) (days post op.) Observation time (months) Angle preoperative (°) Angle postoperative (°) Angle end (°) Bone fusion (months) Kirkaldy-Willis functional outcome Intensive care unit (days)
1 Th12-L1 Th12-L1 1 Harms 165 400 1 27 12 11 12 3+ Excellent 1
2 Th8-Th9 Th8-Th9 1 PEEK 160 1,500 With assistance only 16 19 1 20 6+ Good 3
3 Th8-Th9 Th6-Th12 3 VLIFT 225 1500 2 14 35 20 22 4+ Excellent 3
4 L1-L2 L1-L2 1 Harms 185 600 2 8 14 5 1 6 Good 4
5 Th6-Th7, Th7-Th8 Th4-Th10 4 VLIFT 220 900 2 10 27 11 14 8 Good 2
6 L4-L5 L4-L5 1 Harms 150 500 2 56 −8 −16 −16 5 Good 2
7 L4-L5 L4-L5 1 Harms 155 1,500 2 12 −17 −8 −6 6 Good 2
8 Th11-L1 Th9-L1 VLIFT 360 4,600 2 34 10 6 10 No Fair 4
9 Th11-Th12 Th9-L3 3 VLIFT 185 700 2 47 18 2 8 3 Good 2
10 L4-L5 L4-S1 1 Harms 185 1,000 2 23 −18 −18 −16 5 Excellent 4
11 Th6-Th7-Th8 Th4-Th10 4 VLIFT 285 1,500 14 13 20 19 16 6 Fair 2
12 Th8-Th9 Th7-Th9 Harms 230 400 1 8 20 16 26 No Good 1
13 Th4-Th5 Th4-Th5 1 VLIFT 240 500 11 16 15 8 10 16 Excellent 1
14 L4-L5 L4-L5 1 PEEK 70 500 1 11 −5 −15 −10 4 Excellent 2
15 Th7-Th8 Th5-Th10 2 Harms 300 2,000 5 10 30 14 20 8 Good 2
16 L4-L5 L4-L5 1 PEEK 240 800 1 8 0 −7 −3 5 Fair 2
17 L3-L4 L3-L4 1 Harms 165 600 1 6 6 −6 −1 4 Excellent 2