Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 25;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-23

Table 3.

Results of the regression analyses relating essential fatty acid concentrations in quintiles and pregnancy outcome, defined as small for gestational age SGA and birth weight1

Fatty acid
Birth Weight (g)
SGA
  Mean ± SD Beta ± SE2 % of women with SGA birth within quintile Odds ratio (95% CI)3
EPA
 
 
 
 
Q1
3595 ± 536
−182.5 ± 39.04
12.7
2.09 (1.32-3.30) 4
Q2
3579 ± 542
−66.1 ± 39.0
13.3
1.42 (0.88-2.31)
Q3
3645 ± 474
0.0
9.7
1.00
Q4
3664 ± 498
18.4 ± 38.9
9.6
0.98 (0.59-1.64)
Q5
3619 ± 489
−26.6 ± 39.0
10.8
1.13 (0.68-1.87)
DHA
 
 
 
 
Q1
3518 ± 520
−118.2 ± 39.24
13.3
1.11 (0.70-1.75)
Q2
3593 ± 539
−43.8 ± 39.2
12.7
1.05 (0.66-1.67)
Q3
3636 ± 505
0.0
12.1
1.00
Q4
3602 ± 471
−34.4 ± 39.2
11.7
0.96 (0.60-1.54)
Q5
3621 ± 484
−15.4 ± 39.2
12.0
0.99 (0.62-1.59)
DGLA
 
 
 
 
Q1
3467 ± 472
−127.1 ± 38.94
17.2
1.72 (1.10-2.69)4
Q2
3610 ± 520
16.5 ± 38.9
14.8
1.43 (0.90-2.26)
Q3
3594 ± 531
0.0
10.8
1.00
Q4
3634 ± 495
40.0 ± 38.9
11.5
1.07 (0.66-1.74)
Q5
3665 ± 486
71.0 ± 38.9
7.5
0.67 (0.39-1.15)
AA
 
 
 
 
Q1
3606 ± 507
−52.8 ± 39.1
10.8
1.07 (0.65-1.76)
Q2
3617 ± 501
−42.2 ± 39.1
9.7
0.94 (0.57-1.57)
Q3
3659 ± 482
0.0
10.2
1.00
Q4
3574 ± 533
−85.0 ± 39.04
13.5
1.37 (0.86-2.21)
Q5 3514 ± 494 −145.0 ± 39.14 17.6 1.88 (1.19-2.95)4

1 Linear regression analysis with birth weight as dependent variable and fatty acid concentration as independent variable. n=1659 mother-infant pairs. Q1 to Q5 represents the quintile distribution of the relative concentrations given in Table 3. EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 n-3); DHA, docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 n-3), DGLA; dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (20:3 n-6), AA; arachidonic acid (20:4 n-6). The middle quintile, Q3, used as reference category.

2 Difference between the mean birth weight in the specific quintile and that of the reference quintile.

3 Odds ratio (95% CI).

4p<0.05.