Table 1. Characteristics of poor and good functional outcome groups at follow-up.

Variables	Poor Outcome (n = 40)		Good Outcome (n = 53)		Statistics
Clinical	M	SD	M	SD	F	p-value	Effect Size c
BPRS Depression	13.39	6.0	12.16	3.7	1.40	ns	0.25
BPRS Positive	11.14	5.2	10.45	3.7	0.53	ns	0.16
BPRS Negative	8.44	3.3	7.16	2.9	3.67	ns	0.41
BPRS Mania	9.44	3.1	9.82	4.0	0.23	ns	0.10
Functional
SOFAS	51.99	7.1	71.38	6.9	173.72 a	0.000	2.75
WHOQOL-BREF	47.57	11.8	53.63	8.5	6.65 a	0.012	0.60
WHODAS-II	36.70	19.0	26.69	15.0	5.67 a	0.020	0.59
	N	%	N	%	χ2	p-value	Effect Size d
Employed	6	15.0	30	56.6	16.63	0.000	0.42
Student	17	42.5	31	58.5	2.33	ns	0.16
On a Disability Support Pension	18	45.0	7	13.2	11.72	0.001	0.36
Has a Romantic Partner	7	17.5	23	43.4	7.00	0.008	0.27
Living with Parents or Relative(s)	29	72.5	32	60.4	1.48	ns	0.13
Living with Flatmate(s)	5	12.5	7	13.2	0.01	ns	0.01
Living with Partner	2	5.0	8	15.1	2.42	ns b	0.16
Living Alone	4	10.0	6	11.3	0.04	ns b	0.02

BPRS = Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. SOFAS = Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. WHOQOL-BREF = World Health Organization Quality of Life (BREF) Scale. WHODAS-II = World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.

^aWelch’s statistic correcting for homogeneity of variance violation.

^bFisher’s exact test correcting for cells with n<5.

^cHedges’ g.

^dCramer’s V.