Table 1.
Sensitivity analysis: criteria and assessment of the quality of included studies based on Study Quality Guide 2011 by Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group
|
Criteria |
Randomization |
Allocation |
Blinding |
Baseline comparability |
Follow up |
Valid measures |
Ethical approval |
Informed consent |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studies | |||||||||
| [36] Kriska 1986 |
Yes |
Yes |
Ncl |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
7 |
| [37] McAuley 1994 |
Yes |
Ncl |
Ncl |
Ncl |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
| [38] Rogers 1997 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
3 |
| [39] Sullivan 1998 |
Yes |
Ncl |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
| [40] Resnick 2002 |
Yes |
Ncl |
Ncl |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
| [41] Coull 2004 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
7 |
| [13] Fisher 2004 |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
| [42] Nguyen 2002 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Ncl |
Ncl |
1 |
| [43] Staten 2005 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Ncl |
Yes |
2 |
| [44] Banks-Wallace 2007 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
3 |
| [45] Hogue 2007 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
3 |
| [46] Estabrooks 2008 |
Ncl |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Ncl |
Ncl |
0 |
| [47] Jancey 2008 |
Ncl |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
| [48] Krieger 2009 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Ncl |
Ncl |
Ncl |
1 |
| [49] Zoellner 2010 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
| [50] Takeda 2011 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
5 |
| [51] Lee 2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
7 |
| [52] Maki 2012 |
Ncl |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
| [53] Thomas 2012 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Yes = satisfied quality criterion, No = do not satisfy quality criteria, Ncl = information provided not clear.