Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 25;471(4):1263–1270. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2599-6

Table 1.

Comparison of conventional RAO with our surgical procedure

Parameter Conventional RAO Our procedure
Length of skin incision (cm) ≥ 20–30 10–15
Number of incisions of the fascia lata Two One incision or a y-shaped incision just below the skin incision
Transtrochanteric approach (trochanter osteotomy) No Yes
Detachment of the medial gluteal muscle from the ilium Yes, partially, 7- to 10-cm width from the anterior superior iliac spine* No
Detachment of the rectus femoris muscle Yes, completely No
Division of the external short rotator muscles Yes, completely None except for the piriformis
Thickness of the osteotomized acetabulum cephalad to the joint space (cm) 1.5*–2.5 (1* to 1.5 finger breadths) 2.5 (1.5 finger breadths)
Bone graft for gap between the osteotomized acetabulum and the ilium Yes; one or two trapezoidal bone grafts from the outer table of the iliac wing Yes; one trapezoidal bone graft from the lateral part of the osteotomized acetabulum

* From Ninomiya and Tagawa [18]; from Yasunaga et al. [37]; RAO = rotational acetabular osteotomy.