Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;471(4):1326–1333. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2755-z

Table 5.

Comparison of effect of joint gap or laxity on clinical results from past and current studies

Study Findings Number of knees Followup (years)
Kuster et al. [15] Varus and valgus laxity between 4° and 8° on either side in 20° flexion improved patient satisfaction, ROM without deleterious short- to mid-term effects 44 4.5 (range, 2–7)
Matsuda et al. [17] Coronal laxity, especially balanced laxity, is important for achieving improved ROM in mobile-bearing TKAs 80 1
Matsumoto et al. [18] Joint gap change value (135°–90°) by reducing patellofemoral joint showed positive correlation with postoperative knee flexion angle 25 2
Asano et al. [2] The extension deficit became larger with an increase of soft tissue tension 64 1
Current study Clinical gaps at 120° and 135° had positive correlations with postoperative flexion angle, whereas clinical gaps at 10° showed a positive correlation with postoperative extension angle; well-balanced knees did not show better clinical results 63 2.3 (range, 2–3)