Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 25;471(4):1144–1151. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2237-8

Table 1.

Study and patient characteristics

Study Year Level of evidence Study design Number of JOCD lesions at followup Duration of followup (months)* Age at time of surgery (years)* Lesion location
Lee and Mercurio [22] 1981 IV Retrospective case series 1 7 (6–7) 18 (12–26) 1 MFC
Bradley and Dandy [5] 1989 IV Retrospective case series 11 24 (12–60) 12 (11–13) 11 MFC
Aglietti et al. [2] 1994 IV Retrospective case series 16 56 (34–104) 12.8 (10–14) 16 MFC
Anderson et al. [4] 1997 IV Retrospective case series 20 60 (24–108) 13.5 (9–23) 15 MFC
5 LFC
Kocher et al. [19] 2001 IV Prospective case series 30 45 (24–86) 12.3 (8.5–16.1) 30 MFC
Louisia et al. [25] 2003 IV Retrospective case series 17 141 (36–312) 13.8 (11–29) 17 MFC
Kawasaki et al. [18] 2003 IV Retrospective case series 15 16 (12–24) 12.5 (9–18) 7 MFC
8 LFC
Donaldson and Wojtys [9] 2008 IV Retrospective case series 16 21 (8–38) 12.3 (9–15) 12 MFC
4 LFC
Adachi et al. [1] 2009 IV Retrospective case series 20 32 (13–62) 12 (9–15) 8 MFC
12 LFC
Edmonds et al. [10] 2010 IV Retrospective case series 59 36.3 (1.3–72) 13.4 (8–18.6) 42 MFC
17 LFC
Ojala et al. [27] 2011 IV Prospective case series 5 36.6 (4–79) 15 (7–21) 3 MFC
2 LFC

* Values expressed as means with ranges in parentheses; NR = not reported; MFC = medial femoral condyle; LFC = lateral femoral condyle; JOCD = juvenile osteochondritis dissecans.