Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2012 Feb;43(1):39–49. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9307-8

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Cohort Overall and by Race at Baseline

Range White Black
N 232 104
Study Site
 Chicago, N (%) 117 (50.4) 67 (64.4)**
 Pittsburgh, N (%) 115 (49.6) 37 (35.6)
Age, years, mean (SD) 48–58 50.9 (2.7) 50.6 (2.7)
Time between scans, years, mean (SD) 0.9–4.3 2.3 (0.5) 2.3 (0.4)
BMI, mean (SD) 18.5–50.7 27.9 (5.7) 31.3 (6.9)****
SBP, mmHg, mean (SD) 86–183 114.4 (13.3) 124.3 (16.1)****
DBP, mmHg, mean (SD) 50–110 73.6 (9.2) 78.9 (9.2)****
BP medication use, N (%) 1=present 25 (10.8) 23 (22.1)***
Triglycerides, mg/dL, mean (SD) 39–589 118.1 (64.7) 104.2 (58.0)*
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL, mean (SD) 24–122 58.5 (14.4) 56.6 (12.5)
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL, mean (SD) 48–244 117.3 (31.4) 119.4 (35.5)
Statin a use, N (%) 1=present 12 (5.2) 5 (4.8)
Current Smoker, N (%) 1=present 33 (14.2) 16 (15.4)
Education **
 ≤ High School, N (%) 35 (15.1) 20 (19.2)
 Some College, N (%) 63 (27.2) 39 (37.5)
 ≥ College, N (%) 134 (57.7) 45 (43.3)
Menopausal Status
 Hormone Therapy use, N (%) 1=present 31 (13.4) 8 (7.7)
 Pre-/Early Peri-menopausal, N (%) 1=present 136 (58.6) 59 (56.7)
Low Social Support, N (%) 1=present 35 (15.1) 34 (32.7)****
Depressive Symptoms ≥ 16, N (%) 1=present 31 (13.4) 7 (6.8)*
Calcium Score at baseline, mean (SD) 0–311.5 12.9 (44.7) 8.4 (15.4)
CAC at baseline, N (%)
 0 142 (61.2) 47 (45.2)***
 >0,<10 53 (22.8) 27 (26.0)
 ≥10,<100 30 (12.9) 29 (27.9)
 100+ 7 (3.0) 1 (1.0)
CAC Progression b, N (%) 1=present 42 (18.1) 19 (18.3)
Employed, N (%) 1=present 201 (87.0) 91 (88.4)
Relationship, N (%) 1=present 208 (89.6) 73 (70.2)****
Mother, N (%) 1=present 200 (86.6) 92 (88.5)
Caregiver, N (%) 1=present 35 (15.2) 13 (12.6)
Number of roles occupied, mean (SD) 1–4 2.8 (0.7) 2.6 (0.7)*
a

cholesterol lowering medication

b

Δ CAC ≥ 10 Agatston units

****

p<0.001,

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

<0.10

Continuous variables were compared with unequal variances t-tests, proportions were compared with chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests in case of small cell sizes.