. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr;45(2):249–257. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9438-6

Table 2.

Significance Testing of the Indirect Effect of Social Cohesion on Continuous Smoking Abstinence through Post-Quit Month 6 via Psychosocial Mediators

Mediator	β_apath	β_bpath	Estimate of the Indirect Effect			BC 95% CI		PME	p
Mediator	β_apath	β_bpath	1	2	SD	Lower	Upper	PME	p
Social Support	0.279	0.065	0.018	0.009	0.006	0.000	0.024	0.553	<.05
Negative Affect	−0.514	−0.039	0.020	0.010	0.007	0.001	0.027	0.703	<.05
Positive Affect	0.371	0.036	0.013	0.007	0.005	0.000	0.018	0.469	<.05
Stress	−0.166	−0.123	0.021	0.010	0.006	0.002	0.026	0.753	<.05

Note: Effects were tested in a series of single mediator models. β_apath = Estimate of the effect between social cohesion and the mediator. β_bpath = Estimate of the effect between the mediator and continuous smoking abstinence through Post-Quit Month 6. 1 = The unstandardized indirect effect estimates in the sample. 2 = The standardized indirect effect estimates in the sample. SD = The standard deviation of the standardized indirect effect. BC 95% CI = Bias corrected 95% confidence interval. PME = Proportion of the Mediated Effect. Social Support = Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12; Negative Affect = Positive and Negative Affect Scale, Negative Affect subscale; Positive Affect = Positive and Negative Affect Scale, Positive Affect subscale; Stress = Perceived Stress Scale. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender, total annual household income, educational level, employment status, partner status, tobacco dependence, time, and treatment group.