Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e474–e479. doi: 10.1259/bjr/79381464

Table 2. Correlation of ADC with prognostic factors in IDC NOS.

Prognostic factors No. of cases(n=290) ADC value
(×10−3 mm2 s−11) p-value
Oestrogen receptor Negative (n=113) 0.941±0.168
Positive (n=177) 0.885±0.152 0.003
Progesterone receptor Negative (n=135) 0.928±0.171
Positive (n=155) 0.888±0.148 0.032
HER2 Negative (n=149) 0.911±0.158
Positive (n=141) 0.903±0.164 0.677
Ki-67 <20% (n=112) 0.933±0.152
>20% (n=178) 0.890±0.164 0.028
MVD Not increased (n=63) 0.954±0.167
Increased (n=227) 0.894±0.156 0.009
Size <2 cm (n=133) 0.918±0.162
>2 cm (n=157) 0.898±0.159 0.294
LN metastasis Negative (n=188) 0.919±0.166
Positive (n=102) 0.885±0.147 0.090

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; HER2, human growth factor receptor 2; IDC NOS, invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified; LN, lymph node; MVD, microvascular density.