Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jun;1198:279–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05534.x

Table 1. Repeated measures ANOVAs of raw muscle masses and muscle measures scaled to the other muscles.

1A. Raw Hind Leg Muscle Masses
ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Function level / group 1.386384 2 0.693192 75.98011 2.51E-21 3.080388
Muscle 21.08176 8 2.63522 288.844 3.15E-69 2.025246
Interaction 1.49519 16 0.093449 10.2429 3.06E-15 1.738002
Within 0.98532 108 0.009123
Total 24.94865 134
1B. Muscle Masses Normalized to Measured Hind Leg Muscle Mass
ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Function level / group 0.001304 2 0.000652 1.857689 0.158826 3.042963
Muscle 0.973129 7 0.139018 396.0888 1.9E-110 2.057533
Interaction 0.005978 14 0.000427 1.216509 0.265868 1.743594
Within 0.067388 192 0.000351
Total 1.047799 215
1C. Hind Leg Muscle Ratios (without iliopsoas)
ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Function level / group 5.672938 2 2.836469 4.36662 0.013056 3.009127
Muscle Pair ratio 1691.575 27 62.65091 96.44835 1.1E-210 1.502368
Interaction 47.53946 54 0.88036 1.355276 0.050322 1.356053
Within 436.5177 672 0.64958
Total 2181.305 755