. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 4.

Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2011 Sep;12(3):223–234. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0226-5

Table 2.

Adoption of and Number of Participants Served by Tested and Effective Programs in the Intervention (CTC) and Control (C) Communities

OUTCOME	PROGRAM 2002		PROGRAM 2005		PROGRAM 2007		TEACHER 2005		TEACHER 2007
OUTCOME	CTC	C	CTC	C	CTC	C	CTC	C	CTC	C
ADOPTION: Number of programs	17	11	36	24	44	19	56	55	40	32
ADOPTION: Number of programs	W+=15.50, W−=5.50, n=6, p<0.32		W+=48, W−=18, n=11, p<0.21		W+=60, W−=6, n=11, p<0.05		W+=40, W−=38, n=12, p<0.97		W+=38, W−=17, n=10, p<0.33
PARTICIPATION: Number of participants	3454	3333	5522	6084	11,261	3864	6092	9143	13,146	3263
PARTICIPATION: Number of participants	W+=36, W−= 30, n=11, p<0.83		W+=23, W−=32, n=10, p<0.70		W+=49, W−=6, n=10, p <0.05		W+=30, W−=48, n=12, p<0.52		W+=56, W−=10, n=11, p<0.05

Note: Scores were summed across all programs in the Intervention (CTC) and Control (C) communities.

Significance tests were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/Signed_Rank_Test.html; statistically significant (p<.05) differences based on two-tailed tests are indicated in bold.