Table 1.
Synthetic mediaa | Glucose (%) | Hydrogen (H2) production stage | PHA production stage | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effluent from H2 production stage | Fresh GM2 with half bacterial biomassc | |||||||||||||
Biogas (ml) | H2 | With same bacterial biomass | With half bacterial biomass | |||||||||||
Vol (ml) | % | Yieldb | cdwd | PHBe | NPf | cdw | PHB | NP | cdw | PHB | NP | |||
mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | ||||||||||||
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | ||||||||||||
1× + 0.25× | 0.5 | 75 | 50 | 66.7 | 0.36 | 1660 | ndg | 195 | 1200 | nd | nd | 1680 | nd | nd |
1.0 | 210 | 130 | 61.9 | 0.46 | 1800 | 95 | nd | 1800 | 110 | 70 | 2500 | nd | 60 | |
2.0 | 390 | 150 | 38.5 | 0.27 | 2000 | nd | nd | 2400 | 5 | 20 | 2800 | 80 | 5 | |
1× + 0.5× | 0.5 | 65 | 35 | 53.8 | 0.26 | 1090 | nd | 30 | 1000 | nd | 25 | 1575 | nd | 60 |
1.0 | 235 | 160 | 68.1 | 0.58 | 2050 | nd | 10 | 1700 | 50 | 80 | 2700 | nd | 260 | |
2.0 | 365 | 195 | 53.4 | 0.35 | 2000 | nd | nd | 2000 | 30 | 5 | 3000 | 10 | nd | |
1× + 1× | 0.5 | 55 | 35 | 63.6 | 0.25 | 1360 | 10 | 40 | 1260 | 10 | 15 | 1800 | 15 | 150 |
1.0 | 185 | 120 | 64.9 | 0.43 | 2260 | 15 | 40 | 1920 | 275 | 80 | 2600 | 185 | 300 | |
2.0 | 480 | 245 | 51.0 | 0.42 | 2200 | 10 | 130 | 2000 | 100 | 70 | 3500 | 375 | 190 | |
1× + 2× | 0.5 | 45 | 30 | 66.7 | 0.22 | 995 | nd | 35 | 800 | nd | 90 | 1100 | nd | 145 |
1.0 | 210 | 145 | 69.0 | 0.54 | 1800 | 20 | 5 | 1000 | 200 | 10 | 2800 | 325 | 200 | |
2.0 | 230 | 140 | 60.9 | 0.26 | 3000 | nd | nd | 3000 | 50 | 5 | 4800 | 40 | 15 |
Values are based on three sets of experiments. Standard deviation was less than 5 %
aConcentration of M-9+GM-2 medium
bmol/mol glucose utilized
cBacterial biomass from the effluent of the H2 production stage
dCell dry weight
ePolyhydroxybutyrate
fNew co-polymer
gNot detectable