Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 4;8(3):e58692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058692

Table 1. Experimental design.

Group N°animals (n) Inoculum 1 Day 0 Inoculum 2 Day 15 N°animals (n) Inoculum 3 Day 30
G1 10 H7N2 LPAIVa H7N1 HPAIVb 6 H5N1 HPAIVc
G2 10 Saline solution H7N1 HPAIV
G3 10 Saline solution Saline Solution 6 H5N1 HPAIV

Thirty 2-week old SPF-chickens were randomly distributed into three groups. Animals received the first inoculum (day 0) and 2 weeks later (day 15), birds were challenged with the respective inoculum 2. Six birds from G1 and G2 were consecutively infected 2 weeks later (day 30) with the third inoculum.

Abbreviations: LPAIV = low pathogenic avian influenza virus; HPAIV = highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

a

Chickens from G1 were inoculated intranasally with LPAIV A/Anas plathyrhynchos/Spain/1877/2009 (H7N2) (105.5 ELD50). Birds from G2 and G3 received saline solution.

b

Chickens from G1 and G2 were intranasally challenged with HPAIV A/FPV/Rostock/34 (H7N1) (105.5 ELD50) 15 days after the pre-exposure to H7N2 LPAIV. Birds from G3 received saline solution.

c

Chickens from G1 and G3 were inoculated intranasally with 104.5 ELD50 of A/Great crested grebe/Basque Country/06.03249/2006 (H5N1) 15 days after the challenge with H7N1 HPAIV.