Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 5;9:644. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.69

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Parameter covariation is an important type of information recovered by model calibration. (A) A parameter vector drawn from the peak of the joint posterior distribution (corresponding to a best-fit parameter vector) does not always have components whose values correspond to the peaks of the corresponding marginal distributions (as illustrated for relatively identifiable parameters k1, k36, k64 and k73). In this case, the k1 component of the best-fit vector matches the mean value of the marginal distribution for k1, but this is not true of k36, k64 and k73 or in general. (B) Predicted trajectories arising from three different types of parameter sampling. In each set of panels, pink, blue and green denote representative good, fair and poor fits. Manifold sampling: left panel shows goodness-of-fit to experimental data of a few simulated EC-RP trajectories, and right panel shows the distribution of 1000 –ln(posterior) values sampled from the joint posterior distribution (right; joint sampling). Independent sampling: similar plots but for parameters sampled from independent marginal distributions ignoring covariation. The inset panel expands the distribution for the smallest values of –ln(posterior). Covariance matrix sampling: similar plots but sampling from a multivariate log-normal distribution with mean and covariance computed from the MCMC walk.