Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec 8;41(4):875–890. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9873-7

Table 2.

Predictors of frequency of sexual touching, by gender

Men
Women
Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate
Age
 57–64 1.7+ 1.4 0.8 1.0
 65–74 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.2
 75–85 Ref Ref Ref Ref
Race/ethnicity
 White Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Black 0.6+ 0.8 0.2*** (0.1–0.3) 0.2*** (0.1–0.4)
 Native/Asian/other 0.6 0.6 2.3 2.4
 Hispanic 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.6
Education
 Less than high school Ref Ref Ref Ref
 High school 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.3
 Some college 1.4 1.2 2.7* (1.1–6.3) 2.3+ (1.0–5.2)
 Bachelors (BA) or more 1.9 1.6 1.9 1.5
Relationship type
 Married or cohabiting 1.0 0.6 2.0 1.2
 Other Ref Ref Ref Ref
Physical health
 Poor/fair Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Good 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.4
 Very good 1.4 1.0 2.1* (1.0–4.4) 2.1+ (1.0–4.2)
 Excellent 2.3** (1.3–4.3) 1.4 2.2* (1.0–4.6) 2.4* (1.0–5.5)
Stress 0.7* (0.5–0.9) 0.8 0.7** (0.5–0.9) 1.0
Anxiety symptoms 0.9 1.8* (1.0–3.3) 0.7** (0.5–0.9) 0.9
Depressive symptoms 0.5** (0.3–0.8) 0.6* (0.4–0.9) 0.6* (0.4–0.9) 1.3
Taking SSRI antidepressant 0.4+ 0.4 0.5 0.6
Taking impotence medication 0.9 0.7
How emotionally satisfying is relationship
 Not, slightly, or moderately 0.1*** (0.08–0.3) 0.1*** (0.09–0.2) 0.1*** (0.06–0.2) 0.1*** (0.05–0.2)
 Very 0.4*** (0.2–0.6) 0.4** (0.3–0.7) 0.4* (0.2–0.8) 0.4* (0.2–0.8)
 Extremely Ref Ref Ref Ref

Odds (95% CI’s) from ordered logistic regression models of frequency of sexual touching. Odds in the multivariate columns are from models that include all predictors

Ref reference category

+

p<.1;

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001