Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2012 Mar 5;217:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.02.020

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Simulated selectivity of the sine modulated scheme (e.g. Fig. 1II) as a function of offset and modulation frequency ωm. The SPINEVOLUTION [59] was used for the simulations. For simplicity, a constant 15N RF-field was utilized, and the spin system was 15N–13C, with a distance of rC–N = 1.448 Å. The chemical shift parameters for 13C were δiso = 0 ppm, δaniso = 24 ppm, η = 0.92; for 15N, δiso = 0 ppm, δaniso = 100 ppm, η = 0.8. In the simulations, ω1N = 9 kHz, ω1Cmax=6kHz, and the MAS rate of 11 kHz were used. The maximum intensity in this plot was normalized to 1.