Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 20;48(1):150–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01435.x

Table 1.

Comparison of Intervention Components, Rationale, and Expected Outcomes: The BRIDGE Study

Intervention Components Rationale for Intervention Components Standard Patient-Centered Expected Outcome/Improvement
Clinician interventions
 Standard academic detailing PCPs infrequently use guideline-concordant strategies for depression care. PCP education is effective but only when combined with other approaches. X Improve recognition and management of depression; promote guideline-concordant care
 Case-based, academic detailing PCPs engage in less PDM and rapport building with AAs. Patient-centered and cultural communication skills programs improve patient-reported outcomes. X Expected outcomes from standard intervention plus enhance PCP participatory communication skills; improve patient experiences and MH outcomes
 Monthly newsletters See rationale for standard and case-based academic detailing above. X X Enhance knowledge of evidence base of treatments for depression in general (standard) and specifically for AAs (patient-centered)
 Consultative-liaison psychiatrist Access to collaborative, expert support system enhances initiation and maintenance of treatment of depression in PC settings. X X Enhance initiation and maintenance of treatment. Assist PCP with management of complex patients; enhance MH outcomes
Patient interventions
Depression case manager
 Initial needs assessment Time and resources to comprehensively assess depressed patients’ symptoms, barriers and influencing factors are limited in PC settings. X Increase efficiency and effectiveness of patients’ PC depression evaluation; improve initiation of treatment
Staff expertise to assess access barriers (e.g., cultural beliefs, attitudes, preferences), social context, and communication problems are lacking in PC. X Expected outcomes from standard intervention plus overcome cultural/social barriers to care; individualize treatment goals
 Ongoing follow-up: Education/activation; Supportive counseling Attrition from treatment is high among PC patients with depression. Patient self-efficacy and adherence to treatment improves depression outcomes. X Improve patient knowledge of depression, self-efficacy, adherence to treatment, and depression and functional status outcomes
Access barriers, social context issues, and poor relationships with health professionals (lower trust, PDM) contribute to disparities in depression care. X Expected outcomes from standard intervention plus overcome barriers, increase acceptance of treatment; and improve relationships with health professionals
 Education materials Patients with depression desire information about their illness and various treatments X Improve knowledge about depression among patients and family members
AAs have concerns about use of spirituality, addictiveness of medications, and experiences of care. Culturally targeted messages address these barriers. X Expected outcomes from standard intervention plus improve attitudes; dispel misconceptions about treatment; support use of spirituality for positive coping

BRIDGE, Blacks Receiving Interventions for Depression and Gaining Empowerment; AA, African American; MH, mental health; PC, primary care; PCP, primary care clinician; PDM, participatory decision making.