Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 20;48(1):271–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01437.x

Table 2.

Top (Bottom)-Ranked Facilities Based on the Probability the Shrunken-Rate Composite Score2 Is in the Top (Bottom) Quintile

A. 23 Facilities with Greater Than a 50% Chance the Shrunken-Rate Composite Score Is in the Top Quintile

Probability in Top Quintile Shrunken Rate Shrunken Rank Observed Rate Observed Rank Number of Cases
1.000 0.068 1 0.066 1 222
1.000 0.081 2 0.080 2 149
1.000 0.089 3 0.083 3 87
0.996 0.095 4 0.087 4 77
0.993 0.100 12 0.103 22 109
0.993 0.099 10 0.096 11 135
0.990 0.098 8 0.098 13 174
0.989 0.097 6 0.091 7 104
0.982 0.099 9 0.096 9 69
0.981 0.096 5 0.087 5 29
0.957 0.097 7 0.098 14 55
0.955 0.100 14 0.099 17 86
0.948 0.099 11 0.100 19 93
0.921 0.100 13 0.098 15 44
0.870 0.103 18 0.102 21 64
0.808 0.106 19 0.104 23 137
0.778 0.102 16 0.090 6 23
0.708 0.101 15 0.099 16 10
0.667 0.103 17 0.097 12 23
0.659 0.106 20 0.101 20 36
0.558 0.109 22 0.106 25 37
0.542 0.107 21 0.093 8 10
0.512 0.109 23 0.105 24 28
B. 19 Facilities with Greater Than a 50% Chance the Shrunken-Rate Composite Score Is in the Bottom Quintile

Probability in Bottom Quintile Shrunken Rate Shrunken Rank Observed Rate Observed Rank Number of Cases
1.000 0.169 108 0.176 109 69
1.000 0.171 110 0.183 110 68
1.000 0.184 112 0.190 112 25
1.000 0.167 106 0.167 104 82
0.992 0.168 107 0.173 107 60
0.988 0.170 109 0.173 108 35
0.986 0.173 111 0.187 111 20
0.955 0.164 104 0.171 106 20
0.902 0.156 102 0.154 96 157
0.865 0.164 105 0.168 105 26
0.841 0.155 100 0.161 103 74
0.810 0.153 98 0.155 99 154
0.742 0.157 103 0.153 94 35
0.713 0.155 101 0.153 95 24
0.690 0.153 99 0.154 98 51
0.638 0.151 97 0.150 91 225
0.540 0.149 95 0.158 102 71
0.534 0.149 94 0.154 97 130
0.511 0.150 96 0.150 92 79
*

Composite scores calculated using facility-specific opportunity-based weights.