Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2368–2379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108275

Table 2.

Infant HIV-1 Infections According to Treatment Group.*

Infection Status Overall (N = 1684) Zidovudine (N = 566) Zidovudine plus Nevirapine (N = 562) Zidovudine plus Nelfinavir and Lamivudine (N = 556) P Value
Infected in utero
 Infants — no. 93 37 28 28
 Kaplan–Meier rate — % (95% CI) 5.7 (4.7–6.9) 6.8 (5.0–9.3) 5.1 (3.5–7.3) 5.2 (3.6–7.4) 0.24
Infected during intrapartum period
 4–6 wk
  Infants — no. 32 17 8 7
  Kaplan–Meier rate — % (95% CI) 2.1 (1.5–3.0) 3.4 (2.1–5.4) 1.6 (0.8–3.1) 1.4 (0.7–2.9) 0.07
 3 mo
  Infants — no. 47 24 11 12
  Kaplan–Meier rate — % (95% CI) 3.2 (2.4–4.2) 4.8 (3.2–7.1) 2.2 (1.2–3.9) 2.4 (1.4–4.3) 0.046
Infected in utero or during intrapartum period
 Infants — no. 140 61 39 40
 Kaplan–Meier rate — % (95% CI) 8.5 (7.3–10.0) 11.0 (8.7–14.0) 7.1 (5.2–9.6) 7.4 (5.4–9.9) 0.03
Uninfected — no. 1447 474 490 483
Unknown — no. 97 31 33 33
*

Transmission rates and 95% confidence intervals were estimated on the basis of Kaplan–Meier curves for in utero, intrapartum, and overall transmission. Patients who died or were lost to follow-up were included in this analysis. Infants who were inadvertently enrolled were excluded from the analysis.

The P values for the pairwise comparisons were calculated with the use of Hochberg’s modified Bonferroni approach, with adjustment for two pairwise comparisons. The two pairwise comparisons were zidovudine versus zidovudine plus nevirapine and zidovudine versus zidovudine plus nelfinavir and lamivudine; because of the Hochberg adjustment, the P values were identical for the two comparisons.