Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 7;8(3):e58592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058592

Table 3. Diagnostic performances of follow-up US-FNA, BRAFV600E mutation analysis, and follow-up US-FNA combined to BRAFV600E mutation.

All nodules (n = 49) Follow-up US-FNA BRAFV600E Follow-up US-FNA+BRAFV600E P* Nodules with suspicious US feature (n = 32) Follow-up US-FNA BRAFV600E Follow-up US-FNA+BRAFV600E P*
Sensitivity 83.3 (10/12) 58.3 (7/12) 91.7 (11/12) 0.021 Sensitivity 83.3 (10/12) 58.3 (7/12) 91.7 (11/12) 0.021
Specificity 100.0 (37/37) 100.0 (37/37) 100.0 (37/37) - Specificity 100.0 (20/20) 100.0 (20/20) 100.0 (20/20) -
PPV 100.0 (10/10) 100.0 (7/7) 100.0 (11/11) - PPV 100.0 (10/10) 100.0 (7/7) 100.0 (11/11) -
NPV 94.9 (37/39) 88.1 (37/42) 97.4 (37/38) 0.167 NPV 90.0 (20/22) 80.0 (20/25) 95.2 (20/21) 0.289
Accuracy 95.9 (47/49) 89.8 (44/49) 98.0 (48/49) 0.23 Accuracy 93.8 (30/32) 84.4 (27/32) 96.9 (31/32) 0.241

Note: Raw data are in parentheses

PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, *: P values when comparing US-FNA and US-FNA+BRAFV60